header-logo header-logo

Artistic parody: Making a mockery

14 October 2022 / David Langwallner
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property , Commercial , Defamation
printer mail-detail
97406
In UK law, artistic parodies remain in a grey area between freedom of expression & protecting commercial reputations, as David Langwallner explains

It is arguable that most art is, on some level or another, homage or parody. If we take the late paintings of Picasso, many involved reworkings of the tropes of European art, including 58 paintings alone based on Diego Velázquez’s Las Meninas. ‘I borrow from the best’ is the rule of great art.

In terms of artists of the classical heritage, the most parodied artist is arguably Leonardo da Vinci—from Marcel Duchamp’s famous parody of The Mona Lisa, to a 2005 Last Supper-style advertisement which caused considerable controversy for the French fashion house responsible, and was banned in Italy and France. Parody is close to the edge.

Though da Vinci is outside of copyright protection on account of the ‘life plus 70 years’ rule, art galleries continue to litigate extensively—with mixed results—for their copyright in reproductive images, and argue that parody does reputational

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll