header-logo header-logo

14 October 2022 / David Langwallner
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property , Commercial , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Artistic parody: Making a mockery

97406
In UK law, artistic parodies remain in a grey area between freedom of expression & protecting commercial reputations, as David Langwallner explains

It is arguable that most art is, on some level or another, homage or parody. If we take the late paintings of Picasso, many involved reworkings of the tropes of European art, including 58 paintings alone based on Diego Velázquez’s Las Meninas. ‘I borrow from the best’ is the rule of great art.

In terms of artists of the classical heritage, the most parodied artist is arguably Leonardo da Vinci—from Marcel Duchamp’s famous parody of The Mona Lisa, to a 2005 Last Supper-style advertisement which caused considerable controversy for the French fashion house responsible, and was banned in Italy and France. Parody is close to the edge.

Though da Vinci is outside of copyright protection on account of the ‘life plus 70 years’ rule, art galleries continue to litigate extensively—with mixed results—for their copyright in reproductive images, and argue that parody does reputational

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll