header-logo header-logo

14 October 2022 / David Langwallner
Issue: 7998 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property , Commercial , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Artistic parody: Making a mockery

97406
In UK law, artistic parodies remain in a grey area between freedom of expression & protecting commercial reputations, as David Langwallner explains

It is arguable that most art is, on some level or another, homage or parody. If we take the late paintings of Picasso, many involved reworkings of the tropes of European art, including 58 paintings alone based on Diego Velázquez’s Las Meninas. ‘I borrow from the best’ is the rule of great art.

In terms of artists of the classical heritage, the most parodied artist is arguably Leonardo da Vinci—from Marcel Duchamp’s famous parody of The Mona Lisa, to a 2005 Last Supper-style advertisement which caused considerable controversy for the French fashion house responsible, and was banned in Italy and France. Parody is close to the edge.

Though da Vinci is outside of copyright protection on account of the ‘life plus 70 years’ rule, art galleries continue to litigate extensively—with mixed results—for their copyright in reproductive images, and argue that parody does reputational

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll