header-logo header-logo

17 June 2020
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Ashfords—Susie Murray

Firm hires partner for rural team

Ashfords LLP has announced that it has appointed Susie Murray as a partner, joining its rural team.

Susie is experienced and well-regarded in the agriculture sector and specialises in rural and equestrian non-contentious property matters, ranging from sales, purchases and tenancies, to secured lending, easements, sporting rights and profit à prendre. Susie also advises private clients on property aspects of wealth planning and succession and supports dispute resolution teams on implementation of agreements and court orders relating to rural property.

Susie has advised on disposals of multi-million-pound farming businesses including property arrangements for tax planning, environmental and overage provisions. She has acted for lenders in the taking of security and institutional investors on acquisitions of investment property, advised landed estates in relation to sporting rights and leases, mines and minerals rights, as well as advised in respect of collaboration agreements including licence, share farming, contracting and tenancy agreements.

Susie is a member of the Devon County Agricultural Association, the CLA, a Fellow of the Agricultural Law Association, and a professional member of the NFU.

Darren Blackburn, partner and head of residential property at Ashfords, said: ‘We’re pleased to welcome Susie into the fold. Her depth of expertise across a range of rural disciplines will be of significant benefit to the firm. It will enable our already strong rural team to continue delivering the best possible service to clients in the South West and further afield.’

Susie Murray said: ‘I’m excited to be joining a very strong and rapidly expanding private wealth team in a firm with such a strong rural and equestrian practice. There are some key issues in the rural sector at the moment, from the current COVID-19 crisis encouraging landowners to look at succession planning, to the impact of Brexit on food security. With clients seeking advice on these issues and more, it’s a particularly good time to join a firm like Ashfords that has continuing forward momentum. I look forward to working with new colleagues to make a positive contribution to the firm.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll