The LSB found guidance ‘was not always articulated with sufficient precision’ and that ‘greater cross regulator engagement on draft guidance may have supported a more consistent approach’. Moreover, their responses to direct questions from the profession ‘evolved over time... which risked inconsistent outcomes’.
The LSB, which oversees all eight legal regulators, launched its review in October, after the decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechleys [2025] EWHC. Mazur held that only authorised persons can conduct litigation, prompting confusion about the proper role of legal executives and other non-solicitor fee earners.
CILEX chief executive Jennifer Coupland, said: ‘The LSB report underscores the relevance of Mazur across the entire legal profession.
‘We look forward to presenting our argument that Mazur was wrongly decided in the Court of Appeal next month. In the meantime, CILEX continues to promote the excellent work of CILEX professionals, supporting our members and encouraging them to apply for practice rights.’
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=28793f10_1)
