header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Ask Auntie

Occasional advice

What is the etiquette for a CPR telephone conference? Hardy Alexander-Bell, Wapping

I am not at all surprised that you pose this question. A wealth of information is available about draft directions and telecommunications providers (whatever they are) but there is a dearth of guidance on how to behave and what to wear. It is essential to adopt a pleasant voice. At a face to face court hearing you can easily disguise an aggressive manner with a fake smile or hide a post-luncheon belch with the back of the hand but on a telephone hearing every vocal modulation or body emission is seriously amplified and identifiable. Do not talk across another participant and reintroduce yourself with each contribution in the style of, say, “Ponsonby-Smith, claimant”. Otherwise, you may be mistaken for an opponent and find you were taken to have consented to the most hideous order known to man. You must dress the part. Go to the telephone in smart attire. BBC Television continuity announcers at Alexandra Palace wore dinner jackets or silk blouses (as the case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll