header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Ask Auntie

Occasional advice

What is the etiquette for a CPR telephone conference? Hardy Alexander-Bell, Wapping

I am not at all surprised that you pose this question. A wealth of information is available about draft directions and telecommunications providers (whatever they are) but there is a dearth of guidance on how to behave and what to wear. It is essential to adopt a pleasant voice. At a face to face court hearing you can easily disguise an aggressive manner with a fake smile or hide a post-luncheon belch with the back of the hand but on a telephone hearing every vocal modulation or body emission is seriously amplified and identifiable. Do not talk across another participant and reintroduce yourself with each contribution in the style of, say, “Ponsonby-Smith, claimant”. Otherwise, you may be mistaken for an opponent and find you were taken to have consented to the most hideous order known to man. You must dress the part. Go to the telephone in smart attire. BBC Television continuity announcers at Alexandra Palace wore dinner jackets or silk blouses (as the case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll