header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Ask Auntie

Occasional advice

What is the etiquette for a CPR telephone conference? Hardy Alexander-Bell, Wapping

I am not at all surprised that you pose this question. A wealth of information is available about draft directions and telecommunications providers (whatever they are) but there is a dearth of guidance on how to behave and what to wear. It is essential to adopt a pleasant voice. At a face to face court hearing you can easily disguise an aggressive manner with a fake smile or hide a post-luncheon belch with the back of the hand but on a telephone hearing every vocal modulation or body emission is seriously amplified and identifiable. Do not talk across another participant and reintroduce yourself with each contribution in the style of, say, “Ponsonby-Smith, claimant”. Otherwise, you may be mistaken for an opponent and find you were taken to have consented to the most hideous order known to man. You must dress the part. Go to the telephone in smart attire. BBC Television continuity announcers at Alexandra Palace wore dinner jackets or silk blouses (as the case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll