header-logo header-logo

Ask Auntie

25 September 2008
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Occasional advice

What is the etiquette for a CPR telephone conference? Hardy Alexander-Bell, Wapping

I am not at all surprised that you pose this question. A wealth of information is available about draft directions and telecommunications providers (whatever they are) but there is a dearth of guidance on how to behave and what to wear. It is essential to adopt a pleasant voice. At a face to face court hearing you can easily disguise an aggressive manner with a fake smile or hide a post-luncheon belch with the back of the hand but on a telephone hearing every vocal modulation or body emission is seriously amplified and identifiable. Do not talk across another participant and reintroduce yourself with each contribution in the style of, say, “Ponsonby-Smith, claimant”. Otherwise, you may be mistaken for an opponent and find you were taken to have consented to the most hideous order known to man. You must dress the part. Go to the telephone in smart attire. BBC Television continuity announcers at Alexandra Palace wore dinner jackets or silk blouses (as the case

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
David Lammy, Ellie Reeves and Baroness Levitt have taken up office at the Ministry of Justice, following the cabinet reshuffle
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll