header-logo header-logo

Assange saga finally ends in Saipan

26 June 2024
Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Extradition , International
printer mail-detail

Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder, has agreed a deal with the US authorities where he will plead guilty this week to a single espionage charge in the US District Court in Saipan, after which the US will drop its extradition request

Saipan, in the Northern Mariana Islands, is a US commonwealth island in the western Pacific. Assange is expected to return to his native Australia after the hearing.

Assange faced 18 charges in the US for publishing classified files on the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has been imprisoned in the UK since 2019 after seven years in the Ecuadorian embassy avoiding extradition to Sweden.

The High Court accepted the deal this week.

Shaul Brazil, partner at BCL Solicitors, said: ‘A commonly deployed strategy in US extradition cases is to pursue a robust defence for as long as possible; not necessarily in order to ultimately resist extradition successfully, but to put the requested person in the best possible position to negotiate a favourable plea agreement.

‘Whether or not that was the strategy adopted by Assange, it appears to be the outcome he achieved, albeit with a price paid in the years he spent in prison.’

Rebecca Niblock, partner at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘People in the UK facing extradition requests from the US are often well advised to agree to plea deals, given the way the US plea bargaining system works, and harsh sentences in American courts.

‘The recent decision of the UK High Court to give permission to Assange to appeal may have brought some pressure to bear on him agreeing a US deal—winning the case here was by no means a certainty for the US.

‘While extradition laws have tended towards de-politicisation in recent years, the reality is that there are some cases, such as this one, in which politics and diplomacy are front and centre.

‘Most likely diplomatic pressure from the Australian prime minister played a role in finally bringing this case to a close.

‘Agreeing a plea deal in which Assange serves no more time in custody amounts to a win-win: the US gets a conviction, and Assange gets to go home.’

Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Extradition , International
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Clarke Willmott—Declan Goodwin & Elinor Owen

Corporate and commercial teams in Cardiff boosted by dual partner hire

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

Hill Dickinson—Joz Coetzer & Marc Naidoo

London hires to lead UK launch of international finance team

Switalskis—11 promotions

Switalskis—11 promotions

Firm marks start of year with firmwide promotions round

NEWS
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming sport, from recruitment and training to officiating and fan engagement. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys at Law explains how AI now influences everything from injury prevention to tactical decisions, with clubs using tools such as ‘TacticAI’ to gain competitive edges
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll