header-logo header-logo

26 June 2024
Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Extradition , International
printer mail-detail

Assange saga finally ends in Saipan

Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder, has agreed a deal with the US authorities where he will plead guilty this week to a single espionage charge in the US District Court in Saipan, after which the US will drop its extradition request

Saipan, in the Northern Mariana Islands, is a US commonwealth island in the western Pacific. Assange is expected to return to his native Australia after the hearing.

Assange faced 18 charges in the US for publishing classified files on the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has been imprisoned in the UK since 2019 after seven years in the Ecuadorian embassy avoiding extradition to Sweden.

The High Court accepted the deal this week.

Shaul Brazil, partner at BCL Solicitors, said: ‘A commonly deployed strategy in US extradition cases is to pursue a robust defence for as long as possible; not necessarily in order to ultimately resist extradition successfully, but to put the requested person in the best possible position to negotiate a favourable plea agreement.

‘Whether or not that was the strategy adopted by Assange, it appears to be the outcome he achieved, albeit with a price paid in the years he spent in prison.’

Rebecca Niblock, partner at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘People in the UK facing extradition requests from the US are often well advised to agree to plea deals, given the way the US plea bargaining system works, and harsh sentences in American courts.

‘The recent decision of the UK High Court to give permission to Assange to appeal may have brought some pressure to bear on him agreeing a US deal—winning the case here was by no means a certainty for the US.

‘While extradition laws have tended towards de-politicisation in recent years, the reality is that there are some cases, such as this one, in which politics and diplomacy are front and centre.

‘Most likely diplomatic pressure from the Australian prime minister played a role in finally bringing this case to a close.

‘Agreeing a plea deal in which Assange serves no more time in custody amounts to a win-win: the US gets a conviction, and Assange gets to go home.’

Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Extradition , International
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll