header-logo header-logo

Assange saga finally ends in Saipan

26 June 2024
Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Extradition , International
printer mail-detail

Julian Assange, WikiLeaks founder, has agreed a deal with the US authorities where he will plead guilty this week to a single espionage charge in the US District Court in Saipan, after which the US will drop its extradition request

Saipan, in the Northern Mariana Islands, is a US commonwealth island in the western Pacific. Assange is expected to return to his native Australia after the hearing.

Assange faced 18 charges in the US for publishing classified files on the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has been imprisoned in the UK since 2019 after seven years in the Ecuadorian embassy avoiding extradition to Sweden.

The High Court accepted the deal this week.

Shaul Brazil, partner at BCL Solicitors, said: ‘A commonly deployed strategy in US extradition cases is to pursue a robust defence for as long as possible; not necessarily in order to ultimately resist extradition successfully, but to put the requested person in the best possible position to negotiate a favourable plea agreement.

‘Whether or not that was the strategy adopted by Assange, it appears to be the outcome he achieved, albeit with a price paid in the years he spent in prison.’

Rebecca Niblock, partner at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘People in the UK facing extradition requests from the US are often well advised to agree to plea deals, given the way the US plea bargaining system works, and harsh sentences in American courts.

‘The recent decision of the UK High Court to give permission to Assange to appeal may have brought some pressure to bear on him agreeing a US deal—winning the case here was by no means a certainty for the US.

‘While extradition laws have tended towards de-politicisation in recent years, the reality is that there are some cases, such as this one, in which politics and diplomacy are front and centre.

‘Most likely diplomatic pressure from the Australian prime minister played a role in finally bringing this case to a close.

‘Agreeing a plea deal in which Assange serves no more time in custody amounts to a win-win: the US gets a conviction, and Assange gets to go home.’

Issue: 8077 / Categories: Legal News , Extradition , International
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll