header-logo header-logo

09 April 2024
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Associates show loyalty, like money and don’t yearn to be partner

Partnership is no longer the driving ambition of the majority of solicitors, according to research by legal information provider LexisNexis Legal & Professional

Moreover, associates are both more loyal and more money-driven than law firm leaders assume.

Only one in four current associates want to make partner at their current firm in the next five years, and only 3% aspire to partnership at another firm, in a reversal of traditional law career goals.

This comes as no surprise to almost half of law firm leaders (rising to 63% of leaders at large law firms), who say they have noticed a decline in partnership ambitions among associates. Most of those leaders (71%) attributed the shift to a desire for a better work-life balance.

However, the report, ‘Disloyal lawyers: has the partnership model lost its lustre?’, published this week, also found associates have a strong sense of loyalty to their firm. More than half plan to be at the same firm in five years’ time, with only 12% planning to exit private practice for in-house roles, academia or other career opportunities. This contrasts with the perception of law firm leaders, 72% of whom believe associates are less loyal than previous generations. In fact, some 69% of large law firm leaders cite attracting and retaining talent as one of their biggest challenges.

So, what makes associates stay put? About seven in ten associates would be encouraged to stay by an offer of more money, whereas only 36% would stay for a better work-life balance.

Stuart Greenhill, senior director of segment strategy at LexisNexis, said: ‘The current generation of workers are disruptors, not conformers.

‘If they see something they don't like, they'll push back. To meet growth goals and retain a feasible talent pipeline, law firms will need to find a middle-ground. They cannot rely on what has worked well in the past, especially with the AI revolution well on its way.’

The report, which is based on a survey of more than 500 associates and senior leaders, can be viewed here

Issue: 8066 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll