header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
05 August 2020 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7898 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

At breaking point?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
25505
The relationship between the CCRC & MoJ has recently been described as ‘dysfunctional’. Jon Robins delves into the deeper issues

‘Dysfunctional’ was the word used by the High Court last month to describe the relationship between the miscarriage of justice watchdog and its sponsor department the Ministry of Justice (MoJ). This might not qualify as a revelation to long-time watchers of the chronically underfunded Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC); but the reasons for Lord Justice Fulford and Mrs Justice Whipple’s concern need to be understood.

The case in question concerned a prisoner called Gary Warner, sentenced to 16 years for his role in an armed robbery, and whose application had been turned down by the CCRC. He was represented by barrister Matt Stanbury of Garden Court North and solicitor Dean Kingham of Swain & Co, who last month won the Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year award in recognition of his ‘gritty, difficult and rarely popular’ work.

Gary Warner’s lawyers argued that the Birmingham-based group was not sufficiently free from government

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll