header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
05 August 2020 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7898 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

At breaking point?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
25505
The relationship between the CCRC & MoJ has recently been described as ‘dysfunctional’. Jon Robins delves into the deeper issues

‘Dysfunctional’ was the word used by the High Court last month to describe the relationship between the miscarriage of justice watchdog and its sponsor department the Ministry of Justice (MoJ). This might not qualify as a revelation to long-time watchers of the chronically underfunded Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC); but the reasons for Lord Justice Fulford and Mrs Justice Whipple’s concern need to be understood.

The case in question concerned a prisoner called Gary Warner, sentenced to 16 years for his role in an armed robbery, and whose application had been turned down by the CCRC. He was represented by barrister Matt Stanbury of Garden Court North and solicitor Dean Kingham of Swain & Co, who last month won the Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year award in recognition of his ‘gritty, difficult and rarely popular’ work.

Gary Warner’s lawyers argued that the Birmingham-based group was not sufficiently free from government

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll