header-logo header-logo

25 April 2013 / Frank Maher
Issue: 7557 / Categories: Opinion , Risk management , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Avoiding the Balva trap

istock_000022969802xlarge

Was Balva an accident waiting to happen, asks Frank Maher

Balva—a name which will cause trepidation among members of the 1,300 law firms—one in eight of the profession—who insured with them.

There is no suggestion that they are insolvent. But then equally, what reassurance is available? The unaudited fourth quarter accounts for 2012 will not, on their own (if at all), provide that assurance.

As the English section of Balva’s website states: “Activities of Balva have not stayed unnoticed by international professional organisations.” The Financial Conduct Authority register notes: “The Latvian regulator has prohibited this firm from writing any new business in the UK, effective 1 March 2013.” It is not clear when this note was added, but it first appears to have come to the attention of the press around 12 April 2013, a worrying time lapse.

A secure future?

Now, it is entirely possible that the measures taken by the Latvian authorities will secure Balva’s future, but it will require a degree of faith from policyholders to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll