header-logo header-logo

Avoiding errors & pitfalls in eDiscovery

06 October 2017 / Julia Chain
Issue: 7764 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The eDiscovery process is fraught with potential hazards but some common mistakes can be avoided, says Julia Chain

  • Looks at typical mistakes during the eDiscovery process.

Electronic discovery is now the norm in increasingly complex proceedings where discoverable information can be buried in terabytes of data. The consequences of not doing eDiscovery effectively and with care can be fatal, especially in the early stages of discovery planning. While the following is by no means a totality of what could go wrong, it represents some common mistakes when addressing discovery obligations imposed by the courts.

Collection

During collection, the lack of a developed and detailed data map can leave the parties exposed to potential issues as a project moves through the ‘electronic discovery reference model’ (EDRM). In high risk, high speed matters with strict deadlines, if the location of key data is not properly identified, disruption and delays can easily occur during the course of a disclosure exercise. A robust information governance protocol, including any number of general best practices related to organising

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll