header-logo header-logo

Avoiding non-party costs

17 June 2010 / Helene Pines Richman
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Helene Pines Richman outlines the dangers of acting without insurance

Conditional fee agreements (CFAs) are now a regular feature of the cost landscape particularly in certain types of cases. Almost hand in hand, the rules relating to after the event (ATE) insurance have developed not only in respect of the duty of care owed to clients but also the effects inter partes. The Code of Conduct 2007, r 2.03(1)(g), of which solicitors will be aware, provides that a solicitor must discuss how a client will pay for litigation and whether his liability for another person’s costs may be covered by existing insurance or whether special insurance can be obtained. Solicitors, however, may be less cognisant of the current position in respect to their exposure under the wasted cost jurisdiction and/or third party funding rules (CPR Rules 48.7 and 48.2, respectively).

Early safeguards

Solicitors should raise the issue of ATE insurance and make sure the discussion is well documented, to safeguard any later defence to a negligence claim by a losing client facing a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll