header-logo header-logo

Avoiding non-party costs

17 June 2010 / Helene Pines Richman
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Helene Pines Richman outlines the dangers of acting without insurance

Conditional fee agreements (CFAs) are now a regular feature of the cost landscape particularly in certain types of cases. Almost hand in hand, the rules relating to after the event (ATE) insurance have developed not only in respect of the duty of care owed to clients but also the effects inter partes. The Code of Conduct 2007, r 2.03(1)(g), of which solicitors will be aware, provides that a solicitor must discuss how a client will pay for litigation and whether his liability for another person’s costs may be covered by existing insurance or whether special insurance can be obtained. Solicitors, however, may be less cognisant of the current position in respect to their exposure under the wasted cost jurisdiction and/or third party funding rules (CPR Rules 48.7 and 48.2, respectively).

Early safeguards

Solicitors should raise the issue of ATE insurance and make sure the discussion is well documented, to safeguard any later defence to a negligence claim by a losing client facing a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll