header-logo header-logo

17 June 2010 / Helene Pines Richman
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Avoiding non-party costs

Helene Pines Richman outlines the dangers of acting without insurance

Conditional fee agreements (CFAs) are now a regular feature of the cost landscape particularly in certain types of cases. Almost hand in hand, the rules relating to after the event (ATE) insurance have developed not only in respect of the duty of care owed to clients but also the effects inter partes. The Code of Conduct 2007, r 2.03(1)(g), of which solicitors will be aware, provides that a solicitor must discuss how a client will pay for litigation and whether his liability for another person’s costs may be covered by existing insurance or whether special insurance can be obtained. Solicitors, however, may be less cognisant of the current position in respect to their exposure under the wasted cost jurisdiction and/or third party funding rules (CPR Rules 48.7 and 48.2, respectively).

Early safeguards

Solicitors should raise the issue of ATE insurance and make sure the discussion is well documented, to safeguard any later defence to a negligence claim by a losing client facing a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll