header-logo header-logo

15 October 2009 / Claire O’flinn
Issue: 7389 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Back in the fold

Claire O’Flinn considers the thorny issue of family relocation

In July 2009, research conducted by Dr Marilyn Freeman for the reunite Research Unit and funded by the Ministry of Justice was published (Relocation). The foreword by Mr Justice Singer claims that the “research provides a valuable adjunct to the growing debate on the topic of relocation” but as this article will explore, the reliability of the research conclusions is questionable.

Relocation of children has a serious impact on a number of families each year in England and Wales. In 2008, 122 cases were reported to the reunite advice line and this is probably only a fraction of the cases which involve relocation.

The reunite research study is a stark contrast to ongoing projects in New Zealand and Australia. The Centre for Research on Children and Families in New Zealand is due to report on 31 December 2009 with its findings from a three-year project. The research will include longitudinal data resulting from interviewing family members from 100 families. Family members were interviewed twice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll