header-logo header-logo

Back to the future?

09 April 2009 / Cristian Ley
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Features , Tax , Employment
printer mail-detail

Cristian Ley welcomes the biggest political U-turn since the poll tax

When the government introduced the statutory dispute resolution procedures in October 2004 the aim was to provide a means for problems to be raised and discussed in the workplace and in some cases remove the need to resort to employment tribunals. However, as we all know, even the best laid plans do not always work out as one intends and in 2006 the government asked Michael Gibbons—former chairman of DTI Employment law simplification panel—to review the operation of the procedures and make recommendations for their reform and/or repeal.

Gibbons found that the statutory dispute resolution procedures had significant unintended negative consequences which outweighed any benefits they carried in terms of resolving workplace disputes. This report concluded that the statutory dispute procedures should be repealed, which they were on 6 April 2009 by virtue of the Employment Act 2008.
What replaces the statutory grievance, disciplinary and dismissal procedures?

The revised Acas Code of Practice (the code) will govern grievances, disciplinary proceedings and dismissals

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll