header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Back to the future

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
28 October 2015 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7674 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
web_comment_0

Roger Smith embarks on some legal time-travel

In the month that includes “Back to the Future Day”, October 21, we should look at how legal practice is developing. We might remind ourselves that, whatever lawyers—particularly legal aid practitioners—were saying in October 1985, actually they had never had it so good. The duty solicitor scheme was about to be expanded: expenditure was on the up and set for a record climb through the next decade. The future is going to be so different.

Legal aid: here

Conferences in Birmingham (organised by the Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG)) and Belfast (the Public Interest Litigation Support project) discussed the future for legal aid practitioners. Both were pretty bleak. In particular, the LAPG delegates knew they were under the cosh. The good news was that the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) had sent representatives for the first time: the bad news is what they said when they came. In truth, the Legal Aid Agency’s Hugh Barrett and Caroline Crowther had little option but to mouth their masters’ line that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Big tech for small firms
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
NLJ this week: Presumption of capacity reaffirmed
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
NLJ this week: Justice delayed, justice denied
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
NLJ this week: The road ahead for employment rights
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: SLAPPed shut?
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll