header-logo header-logo

12 April 2013 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7555 / Categories: Opinion , Judicial review
printer mail-detail

Back on track?

Malcolm Dowden follows the latest disputes surrounding the HS2 rail link

The government has announced the routes for both phases of the HS2 rail link, and succeeded on nine points out of the 10 decided at judicial review in R (Buckinghamshire) v Secretary of State [2013] EWHC 481 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 185 (Mar). The court found that the government’s consultation on compensation issues had been inadequate. The government is revisiting that issue rather than appealing the decision, considering that a renewed consultation would be more cost and time-effective. Nonetheless, the project has a long way to go. Even if there are no legislative delays trains will not run along the London to Birmingham section until 2026. While legislation is pending, and as construction proceeds, there is significant scope for disputes over compulsory purchase, compensation and land access rights.

Freedom of information

Protesters have already turned to the law on grounds other than those covered in the judicial review. A Staffordshire protest group has obtained an order requiring HS2 to disclose its criteria

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll