header-logo header-logo

Back on track?

12 April 2013 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7555 / Categories: Opinion , Judicial review
printer mail-detail

Malcolm Dowden follows the latest disputes surrounding the HS2 rail link

The government has announced the routes for both phases of the HS2 rail link, and succeeded on nine points out of the 10 decided at judicial review in R (Buckinghamshire) v Secretary of State [2013] EWHC 481 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 185 (Mar). The court found that the government’s consultation on compensation issues had been inadequate. The government is revisiting that issue rather than appealing the decision, considering that a renewed consultation would be more cost and time-effective. Nonetheless, the project has a long way to go. Even if there are no legislative delays trains will not run along the London to Birmingham section until 2026. While legislation is pending, and as construction proceeds, there is significant scope for disputes over compulsory purchase, compensation and land access rights.

Freedom of information

Protesters have already turned to the law on grounds other than those covered in the judicial review. A Staffordshire protest group has obtained an order requiring HS2 to disclose its criteria

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll