header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 April 2013 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7555 / Categories: Opinion , Judicial review
printer mail-detail

Back on track?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Malcolm Dowden follows the latest disputes surrounding the HS2 rail link

The government has announced the routes for both phases of the HS2 rail link, and succeeded on nine points out of the 10 decided at judicial review in R (Buckinghamshire) v Secretary of State [2013] EWHC 481 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 185 (Mar). The court found that the government’s consultation on compensation issues had been inadequate. The government is revisiting that issue rather than appealing the decision, considering that a renewed consultation would be more cost and time-effective. Nonetheless, the project has a long way to go. Even if there are no legislative delays trains will not run along the London to Birmingham section until 2026. While legislation is pending, and as construction proceeds, there is significant scope for disputes over compulsory purchase, compensation and land access rights.

Freedom of information

Protesters have already turned to the law on grounds other than those covered in the judicial review. A Staffordshire protest group has obtained an order requiring HS2 to disclose its criteria

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll