header-logo header-logo

Backlog report highlights shocking impacts of Crown Court delays

05 March 2025
Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) appears to have ‘simply accepted’ Crown Court backlogs will continue to grow rather than taking the urgent action required, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has warned.

In a devastating report this week, PAC—one of Parliament’s most influential committees—highlighted the impact of the delays and urged the government to act now rather than waiting for Sir Brian Leveson’s independent review of the criminal courts to report in the autumn.

PAC’s chair, Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP, said it was ‘disappointing’ the backlog is at a record high of 73,000, compared to a record low of 33,290 in March 2019 pre-COVID.

‘Victims of rape and serious sexual offences (RASSO) can wait for three years or more for these cases to come to trial,’ he said. ‘In 2024, 59% of victims of adult rape dropped out of the justice system because research shows they could not bear the trauma any longer.

‘The remand population has almost doubled from 9,602 in 2018 to 17,600 in September 2024 (20% of the entire prison population). 770 prisoners have been on remand for over two years. These are shocking statistics involving sometimes innocent people which should be carefully scrutinised to see how the system could be improved’.

The report, ‘Crown Court backlogs’, noted more than a third (35%) of prisoners on remand in 2022 did not ultimately receive a custodial sentence, including 13% who were acquitted entirely. It urged the Lord Chancellor and Lady Chief Justice to look for ways to reduce remand numbers to 2019 levels, freeing up 8,000 prison places.

It recommended the MoJ and judiciary try to reduce the number of on-the-day postponements of hearings in serious sexual and violent cases, which are highly distressing for victims, and to protect funding for victim support services.

It also expressed concern that one in four trials fail to take place on their scheduled date (ineffective trials) compared to about 15% of trials pre-pandemic. It noted some of these delays would be ‘straightforward to resolve’: for example, building maintenance issues, poor case preparation, or where remand prisoners arrive late at court.

Issue: 8107 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll