header-logo header-logo

Bad publicity?

22 September 2011 / Malcolm Dowden , Jen Hawkins
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Features , Marketing
printer mail-detail

Jen Hawkins & Malcolm Dowden advise when consent is required for a roadside advertisement

Marketing firms and websites are inviting passing motorists to “buy” roadside advertising space, often on trailers, in fields alongside major roads while farmers and landowners are being offered significant sums of money to install hoardings on their land. Confusion over the law has led some landowners to believe that they do not need consent from the local planning authority (LPA) to display the advertisements. However, if the government takes onboard recent campaigns and decides to act to stamp out unconsented motorway advertising, misconceived landowners out to make a fast buck could find themselves guilty of an offence.

LPA powers

It is clear that the primary responsibility for tackling the problems lies with LPAs. But tight resources and budget cuts may restrict the potential of LPAs to exercise their powers to take enforcement action. Clear guidance, stronger government policy, and further legislative empowerment are needed to support LPAs in carrying out their enforcement role.

In England, outdoor advertisements are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll