header-logo header-logo

22 September 2011 / Malcolm Dowden , Jen Hawkins
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Features , Marketing
printer mail-detail

Bad publicity?

Jen Hawkins & Malcolm Dowden advise when consent is required for a roadside advertisement

Marketing firms and websites are inviting passing motorists to “buy” roadside advertising space, often on trailers, in fields alongside major roads while farmers and landowners are being offered significant sums of money to install hoardings on their land. Confusion over the law has led some landowners to believe that they do not need consent from the local planning authority (LPA) to display the advertisements. However, if the government takes onboard recent campaigns and decides to act to stamp out unconsented motorway advertising, misconceived landowners out to make a fast buck could find themselves guilty of an offence.

LPA powers

It is clear that the primary responsibility for tackling the problems lies with LPAs. But tight resources and budget cuts may restrict the potential of LPAs to exercise their powers to take enforcement action. Clear guidance, stronger government policy, and further legislative empowerment are needed to support LPAs in carrying out their enforcement role.

In England, outdoor advertisements are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll