header-logo header-logo

22 September 2011 / Malcolm Dowden , Jen Hawkins
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Features , Marketing
printer mail-detail

Bad publicity?

Jen Hawkins & Malcolm Dowden advise when consent is required for a roadside advertisement

Marketing firms and websites are inviting passing motorists to “buy” roadside advertising space, often on trailers, in fields alongside major roads while farmers and landowners are being offered significant sums of money to install hoardings on their land. Confusion over the law has led some landowners to believe that they do not need consent from the local planning authority (LPA) to display the advertisements. However, if the government takes onboard recent campaigns and decides to act to stamp out unconsented motorway advertising, misconceived landowners out to make a fast buck could find themselves guilty of an offence.

LPA powers

It is clear that the primary responsibility for tackling the problems lies with LPAs. But tight resources and budget cuts may restrict the potential of LPAs to exercise their powers to take enforcement action. Clear guidance, stronger government policy, and further legislative empowerment are needed to support LPAs in carrying out their enforcement role.

In England, outdoor advertisements are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll