header-logo header-logo

Bad publicity?

22 September 2011 / Malcolm Dowden , Jen Hawkins
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Features , Marketing
printer mail-detail

Jen Hawkins & Malcolm Dowden advise when consent is required for a roadside advertisement

Marketing firms and websites are inviting passing motorists to “buy” roadside advertising space, often on trailers, in fields alongside major roads while farmers and landowners are being offered significant sums of money to install hoardings on their land. Confusion over the law has led some landowners to believe that they do not need consent from the local planning authority (LPA) to display the advertisements. However, if the government takes onboard recent campaigns and decides to act to stamp out unconsented motorway advertising, misconceived landowners out to make a fast buck could find themselves guilty of an offence.

LPA powers

It is clear that the primary responsibility for tackling the problems lies with LPAs. But tight resources and budget cuts may restrict the potential of LPAs to exercise their powers to take enforcement action. Clear guidance, stronger government policy, and further legislative empowerment are needed to support LPAs in carrying out their enforcement role.

In England, outdoor advertisements are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll