18 November 2011 / Andrew Parsons

Issue: 7490 / Categories: Features , Public , Mental health

printer

mail-detail

In the balance?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Andrew Parsons deliberates over the court’s approach to the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment

Although it has been known for some time that an application may be made to the court of protection to authorise the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from a patient in a vegetative state (VS) a recent case, Re M [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam), [2011] All ER (D) 142 (Sep) has looked at the rather more difficult question of when this should be withdrawn from a patient whose condition was not so acute as to amount to a VS, albeit the quality of life was limited. It was argued that there is a difference between VS and minimally conscious state (MCS) cases. In VS cases, the balance falls in one direction in favour of withdrawal. In MCS cases, it depends on the facts, and, in assessing best interests, the court must follow a balance sheet approach.

Irreparable brain damage

The patient, M, fell into a coma in 2003 aged 43 as a result of viral encephalitis which caused extensive and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

In the balance?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Andrew Parsons deliberates over the court’s approach to the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment

Although it has been known for some time that an application may be made to the court of protection to authorise the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from a patient in a vegetative state (VS) a recent case, Re M [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam), [2011] All ER (D) 142 (Sep) has looked at the rather more difficult question of when this should be withdrawn from a patient whose condition was not so acute as to amount to a VS, albeit the quality of life was limited. It was argued that there is a difference between VS and minimally conscious state (MCS) cases. In VS cases, the balance falls in one direction in favour of withdrawal. In MCS cases, it depends on the facts, and, in assessing best interests, the court must follow a balance sheet approach.

Irreparable brain damage

The patient, M, fell into a coma in 2003 aged 43 as a result of viral encephalitis which caused extensive and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS

NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year

NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle

As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR

NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control

In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473

NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’

A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

NLJ this week: CPR tweak closes third-party disclosure gap

A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing

back-to-top-scroll