header-logo header-logo

Debanking: balancing transparency & compliance

223033
David Hamilton on how the UK’s new debanking rules reshape financial services risk management
  • This article considers the intentions and implications of the Payment Services and Payment Accounts (Contract Termination) (Amendment) Regulations 2025.
  • There are two principal changes to the existing Payment Services Regulations framework: the notice period payment firms must give customers prior to terminating services, and the explanations payment firms must give customers for their decisions to terminate services.
  • The compliance requirements on payment firms include customer onboarding and risk assessments, maintaining detailed records and training provisions.

On 28 April 2025, the UK government introduced a draft statutory instrument titled the Payment Services and Payment Accounts (Contract Termination) (Amendment) Regulations 2025 (the amended PSPA Regulations). Despite the prosaic title, the amended PSPA Regulations (if passed) have potentially significant implications for how firms terminate the provision of payment services, commonly referred to as ‘debanking’.

Since Nigel Farage’s public spat with Coutts Bank in 2023, the issue of debanking has drawn sustained public, political and regulatory scrutiny, becoming emblematic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll