header-logo header-logo

Debanking: balancing transparency & compliance

223033
David Hamilton on how the UK’s new debanking rules reshape financial services risk management
  • This article considers the intentions and implications of the Payment Services and Payment Accounts (Contract Termination) (Amendment) Regulations 2025.
  • There are two principal changes to the existing Payment Services Regulations framework: the notice period payment firms must give customers prior to terminating services, and the explanations payment firms must give customers for their decisions to terminate services.
  • The compliance requirements on payment firms include customer onboarding and risk assessments, maintaining detailed records and training provisions.

On 28 April 2025, the UK government introduced a draft statutory instrument titled the Payment Services and Payment Accounts (Contract Termination) (Amendment) Regulations 2025 (the amended PSPA Regulations). Despite the prosaic title, the amended PSPA Regulations (if passed) have potentially significant implications for how firms terminate the provision of payment services, commonly referred to as ‘debanking’.

Since Nigel Farage’s public spat with Coutts Bank in 2023, the issue of debanking has drawn sustained public, political and regulatory scrutiny, becoming emblematic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll