header-logo header-logo

Bank fined for failures in AML oversight & management

12 December 2022
Issue: 8007 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Regulatory , Banking , Financial services litigation
printer mail-detail
Santander UK has been fined £107m for ‘serious and persistent’ gaps in its anti-money laundering (AML) controls on business banking customers.

The bank qualified for a 30% discount (from almost £154m) because it did not dispute the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) findings and agreed to settle. The FCA found the UK part of the bank failed to properly oversee and manage its AML systems between 31 December 2012 and 18 October 2017. It had ineffective systems to verify the information provided by customers about the business they would be doing, and failed to properly monitor the money customers told them would be going through their accounts compared with what was being deposited.

In one case, a new customer opened an account as a small translations business with expected monthly deposits of £5,000. Within six months it was receiving millions in deposits, and swiftly transferring the money to separate accounts. The FCA also found that, while the account was recommended for closure by the bank’s own AML team in March 2014, poor processes and structures meant this was not acted on until September 2015, by which time millions of pounds had been transferred through the account.

The FCA found several other accounts where there was a serious money laundering risk, as well as examples of the bank failing to deal promptly with ‘red flags’ associated with suspicious activity.

Mark Steward, an executive director at the FCA, said Santander’s ‘poor management… created a prolonged and severe risk of money laundering and financial crime’.

The FCA has previously fined Standard Chartered Bank £102m in 2019 for AML breaches in two high-risk areas. Last December, it fined HSBC nearly £64m for serious weaknesses in monitoring systems over an eight-year period, and an FCA investigation led to NatWest being fined £264m in the same month at Southwark Crown Court for three AML offences.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll