header-logo header-logo

12 December 2022
Issue: 8007 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Regulatory , Banking , Financial services litigation
printer mail-detail

Bank fined for failures in AML oversight & management

Santander UK has been fined £107m for ‘serious and persistent’ gaps in its anti-money laundering (AML) controls on business banking customers.

The bank qualified for a 30% discount (from almost £154m) because it did not dispute the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) findings and agreed to settle. The FCA found the UK part of the bank failed to properly oversee and manage its AML systems between 31 December 2012 and 18 October 2017. It had ineffective systems to verify the information provided by customers about the business they would be doing, and failed to properly monitor the money customers told them would be going through their accounts compared with what was being deposited.

In one case, a new customer opened an account as a small translations business with expected monthly deposits of £5,000. Within six months it was receiving millions in deposits, and swiftly transferring the money to separate accounts. The FCA also found that, while the account was recommended for closure by the bank’s own AML team in March 2014, poor processes and structures meant this was not acted on until September 2015, by which time millions of pounds had been transferred through the account.

The FCA found several other accounts where there was a serious money laundering risk, as well as examples of the bank failing to deal promptly with ‘red flags’ associated with suspicious activity.

Mark Steward, an executive director at the FCA, said Santander’s ‘poor management… created a prolonged and severe risk of money laundering and financial crime’.

The FCA has previously fined Standard Chartered Bank £102m in 2019 for AML breaches in two high-risk areas. Last December, it fined HSBC nearly £64m for serious weaknesses in monitoring systems over an eight-year period, and an FCA investigation led to NatWest being fined £264m in the same month at Southwark Crown Court for three AML offences.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll