header-logo header-logo

Banker can’t lord it over villagers

17 October 2013
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Owner of Over Hall loses title but keeps his land in Court of Appeal battle

A “Lord of the Manor” has lost his title but held his land after a dispute with villagers.

Former banker Peter Burton and his partner bought Over Hall, a dilapidated 17th century manor house in Lancashire, near the village of Ireby. 

Burton purchased the title, Lordship of the Manor of Ireby, for £1 after discovering its existence among old title deeds. He then sought to register ownership of 360 acres of Ireby Fell, registered common land nearby, which he believed belonged to the title holder.

In 2005, the Land Registry confirmed the Burtons’ ownership of the Fell and they began to exert authority over the area, putting up a gate and fencing, asking locals not to park on the land and letting out shooting and grazing rights. This strained relations between the couple and local villagers.

Five local residents brought a legal challenge. They relied on a 1254 charter of King Henry III, which granted land to the Knights Hospitaller of St John of Jerusalem, and later historical records from the Tudor period through to the present day.

In 2010, the Land Registry held that the manorial title had lapsed but the couple were the proprietors of the land. 

The residents contended that since the couple did not have the title they should not have the land.

However, the Court of Appeal this week upheld an earlier High Court ruling in favour of the Burtons.

Lord Justice Mummery, giving the lead judgment in Walker v Burton [2013] EWCA Civ 1228, said that while the 14 lever arch files of historical materials were “interesting. Very little of it is of direct legal relevance”.

Dismissing the five local residents’ appeal, he said there was “no prospect” of anyone other than the Burtons being registered as proprietors of the Fell, since the appellants made no claim and the Crown showed no sign of asserting its right to the title. 

“It was a relevant consideration that the Fell should be owned by someone rather than left in limbo with continuing uncertainty about title to it,” he said. Moreover, the Burtons “had invested time, effort and money on improving the Fell and its management”.

 

Issue: 7580 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll