header-logo header-logo

17 October 2013
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Banker can’t lord it over villagers

Owner of Over Hall loses title but keeps his land in Court of Appeal battle

A “Lord of the Manor” has lost his title but held his land after a dispute with villagers.

Former banker Peter Burton and his partner bought Over Hall, a dilapidated 17th century manor house in Lancashire, near the village of Ireby. 

Burton purchased the title, Lordship of the Manor of Ireby, for £1 after discovering its existence among old title deeds. He then sought to register ownership of 360 acres of Ireby Fell, registered common land nearby, which he believed belonged to the title holder.

In 2005, the Land Registry confirmed the Burtons’ ownership of the Fell and they began to exert authority over the area, putting up a gate and fencing, asking locals not to park on the land and letting out shooting and grazing rights. This strained relations between the couple and local villagers.

Five local residents brought a legal challenge. They relied on a 1254 charter of King Henry III, which granted land to the Knights Hospitaller of St John of Jerusalem, and later historical records from the Tudor period through to the present day.

In 2010, the Land Registry held that the manorial title had lapsed but the couple were the proprietors of the land. 

The residents contended that since the couple did not have the title they should not have the land.

However, the Court of Appeal this week upheld an earlier High Court ruling in favour of the Burtons.

Lord Justice Mummery, giving the lead judgment in Walker v Burton [2013] EWCA Civ 1228, said that while the 14 lever arch files of historical materials were “interesting. Very little of it is of direct legal relevance”.

Dismissing the five local residents’ appeal, he said there was “no prospect” of anyone other than the Burtons being registered as proprietors of the Fell, since the appellants made no claim and the Crown showed no sign of asserting its right to the title. 

“It was a relevant consideration that the Fell should be owned by someone rather than left in limbo with continuing uncertainty about title to it,” he said. Moreover, the Burtons “had invested time, effort and money on improving the Fell and its management”.

 

Issue: 7580 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll