header-logo header-logo

03 June 2016 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7701 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Banking on experts

Donna Goldsworthy & Andrew Kasapis consider the role of an expert in commercial litigation & banking case

Some cases are won or lost on the strength of expert evidence. Under the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Pt 35.1, the courts now have a duty to restrict expert evidence to “that which is reasonably required to resolve the proceedings”. The court has to make a judgment on how cogent the expert evidence will be; how helpful it will be in resolving issues and how much it will cost and the relativity of the sums at stake. Guidance for the Instruction of Experts in Civil Claims, published by the Civil Justice Council also focuses on costs and proportionality. The court’s permission is required to call oral expert evidence.

Some litigators find it helpful to consult a “behind the scenes” expert at an early stage of a case, particularly when a matter is complex. An expert adviser can assist through clarification and explanation of technical and commercial issues, and in other areas such as scoping for disclosure. Clients

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll