header-logo header-logo

Banking on experts

03 June 2016 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7701 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Donna Goldsworthy & Andrew Kasapis consider the role of an expert in commercial litigation & banking case

Some cases are won or lost on the strength of expert evidence. Under the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Pt 35.1, the courts now have a duty to restrict expert evidence to “that which is reasonably required to resolve the proceedings”. The court has to make a judgment on how cogent the expert evidence will be; how helpful it will be in resolving issues and how much it will cost and the relativity of the sums at stake. Guidance for the Instruction of Experts in Civil Claims, published by the Civil Justice Council also focuses on costs and proportionality. The court’s permission is required to call oral expert evidence.

Some litigators find it helpful to consult a “behind the scenes” expert at an early stage of a case, particularly when a matter is complex. An expert adviser can assist through clarification and explanation of technical and commercial issues, and in other areas such as scoping for disclosure. Clients

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll