header-logo header-logo

09 September 2016
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Bankruptcy

Re Whyte; Brittain and another v Whyte and another [2016] All ER (D) 90 (Aug), [2016] Lexis Citation 545

 

The applicant trustees in bankruptcy sought directions in a case where both a restraint order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and a subsequent bankruptcy order had been made against a bankrupt party, W. The High Court held that, on the proper construction of s 306A of the Insolvency Act 1986 and s 417 of the 2002 Act, all and any property which was or might become the subject of the restraint order and which would, but for the restraint order, be vested or be capable of vesting in the trustees, including any property acquired by or devolving upon W at any time between the commencement of his bankruptcy and the date of its discharge, would vest in the trustees as part of W’s bankruptcy estate immediately upon the discharge of the restraint order.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll