header-logo header-logo

07 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Bankruptcy—Trustee in bankruptcy—Expenses

Appleyard v Wewelwala [2012] EWHC 3302 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 285 (Nov)

Chancery Division, Briggs J, 23 November 2012

The High Court may rely on its inherent jurisdiction to make provision for the payment of a trustee in bankruptcy’s expenses where the bankruptcy order has been successfully overturned on an appeal, on an application of which he was not notified, at a hearing he did not attended and by an order which made no provision for his release form office.

Louise Bowmaker (instructed by Ward Hadaway) for the trustee. The respondent appeared in person.

In April 2011, the respondent was made bankrupt on the petition of a creditor. In July 2011, a trustee in bankruptcy was appointed. The trustee began incurring expenses in discharging his duties. In October 2011, the respondent’s application for permission to appeal against the petition was adjourned and the creditor was directed to attend the adjourned hearing (the October order). The October order did not state that the appeal would immediately follow if permission was granted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll