header-logo header-logo

07 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Bankruptcy—Trustee in bankruptcy—Expenses

Appleyard v Wewelwala [2012] EWHC 3302 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 285 (Nov)

Chancery Division, Briggs J, 23 November 2012

The High Court may rely on its inherent jurisdiction to make provision for the payment of a trustee in bankruptcy’s expenses where the bankruptcy order has been successfully overturned on an appeal, on an application of which he was not notified, at a hearing he did not attended and by an order which made no provision for his release form office.

Louise Bowmaker (instructed by Ward Hadaway) for the trustee. The respondent appeared in person.

In April 2011, the respondent was made bankrupt on the petition of a creditor. In July 2011, a trustee in bankruptcy was appointed. The trustee began incurring expenses in discharging his duties. In October 2011, the respondent’s application for permission to appeal against the petition was adjourned and the creditor was directed to attend the adjourned hearing (the October order). The October order did not state that the appeal would immediately follow if permission was granted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll