header-logo header-logo

Bankruptcy—Trustee in bankruptcy—Expenses

07 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Appleyard v Wewelwala [2012] EWHC 3302 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 285 (Nov)

Chancery Division, Briggs J, 23 November 2012

The High Court may rely on its inherent jurisdiction to make provision for the payment of a trustee in bankruptcy’s expenses where the bankruptcy order has been successfully overturned on an appeal, on an application of which he was not notified, at a hearing he did not attended and by an order which made no provision for his release form office.

Louise Bowmaker (instructed by Ward Hadaway) for the trustee. The respondent appeared in person.

In April 2011, the respondent was made bankrupt on the petition of a creditor. In July 2011, a trustee in bankruptcy was appointed. The trustee began incurring expenses in discharging his duties. In October 2011, the respondent’s application for permission to appeal against the petition was adjourned and the creditor was directed to attend the adjourned hearing (the October order). The October order did not state that the appeal would immediately follow if permission was granted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll