header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009 / David Hislop
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Banking
printer mail-detail

Banks, SARS & the customer

Banks & customers are potential victims in an unhappy balance,
says David Hislop

Part 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2007 (POCA 2002) put banks between a rock and a hard place. The bank has no interest in acting contrary to the needs or interests of their customers upon who they rely for business. Doubtless they have every desire to meet their own contractual duties owed to their customers in the interests of good business. But Pt 7 of POCA 2002 clearly puts the bank between its customer and the legislature.

Even if a bank account did not contain funds which were criminal property and no offence had been committed by the customer, s 328(1) applied where the bank had a suspicion that it was involved in dealing with criminal property; the combined effect of ss 328(2), 335 and 338 is to force a third party in the bank’s position to report its suspicions to the relevant authorities and not to move suspect funds or property for the requisite time period;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll