header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009 / David Hislop
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Banking
printer mail-detail

Banks, SARS & the customer

Banks & customers are potential victims in an unhappy balance,
says David Hislop

Part 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2007 (POCA 2002) put banks between a rock and a hard place. The bank has no interest in acting contrary to the needs or interests of their customers upon who they rely for business. Doubtless they have every desire to meet their own contractual duties owed to their customers in the interests of good business. But Pt 7 of POCA 2002 clearly puts the bank between its customer and the legislature.

Even if a bank account did not contain funds which were criminal property and no offence had been committed by the customer, s 328(1) applied where the bank had a suspicion that it was involved in dealing with criminal property; the combined effect of ss 328(2), 335 and 338 is to force a third party in the bank’s position to report its suspicions to the relevant authorities and not to move suspect funds or property for the requisite time period;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll