header-logo header-logo

Bar complaints-handling system faces overhaul

03 January 2008
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal Services

The complaints-handling regime against barristers looks set for a major overhaul following the launch of a consultation on the process by the Bar Standards Board (BSB). Views are being sought on significant changes to the way complaints about barristers, and any subsequent disciplinary proceedings, are handled. These include the introduction of the concept of “improper behaviour” towards non-clients and a new process to speed the disposal of cases where the barrister is prepared to agree to the outcome of a complaint. Plans to extend the complaints commissioner’s powers, to allow him to make recommendations for the disposal of complaints that do not require disciplinary action, are also outlined.

The consultation, Complaints and Disciplinary Processes, follows the publication last July of a strategic review by complaints commissioner Rob Behrens, of the Bar’s complaints and disciplinary processes, in which he said the current system was in need of significant improvement and made 52 recommendations for change.

Ruth Evans, BSB chairman, says: “The proposals are designed to ensure that the complaints and disciplinary system is fair and effective.

The changes should improve the speed and efficiency of the system and, also, increase the confidence and satisfaction of consumers and barristers in the system.” The consultation paper can be downloaded at www.barstandardsboard.org.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll