header-logo header-logo

Bar complaints-handling system faces overhaul

03 January 2008
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal Services

The complaints-handling regime against barristers looks set for a major overhaul following the launch of a consultation on the process by the Bar Standards Board (BSB). Views are being sought on significant changes to the way complaints about barristers, and any subsequent disciplinary proceedings, are handled. These include the introduction of the concept of “improper behaviour” towards non-clients and a new process to speed the disposal of cases where the barrister is prepared to agree to the outcome of a complaint. Plans to extend the complaints commissioner’s powers, to allow him to make recommendations for the disposal of complaints that do not require disciplinary action, are also outlined.

The consultation, Complaints and Disciplinary Processes, follows the publication last July of a strategic review by complaints commissioner Rob Behrens, of the Bar’s complaints and disciplinary processes, in which he said the current system was in need of significant improvement and made 52 recommendations for change.

Ruth Evans, BSB chairman, says: “The proposals are designed to ensure that the complaints and disciplinary system is fair and effective.

The changes should improve the speed and efficiency of the system and, also, increase the confidence and satisfaction of consumers and barristers in the system.” The consultation paper can be downloaded at www.barstandardsboard.org.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
back-to-top-scroll