header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Bar complaints-handling system faces overhaul

Legal Services

The complaints-handling regime against barristers looks set for a major overhaul following the launch of a consultation on the process by the Bar Standards Board (BSB). Views are being sought on significant changes to the way complaints about barristers, and any subsequent disciplinary proceedings, are handled. These include the introduction of the concept of “improper behaviour” towards non-clients and a new process to speed the disposal of cases where the barrister is prepared to agree to the outcome of a complaint. Plans to extend the complaints commissioner’s powers, to allow him to make recommendations for the disposal of complaints that do not require disciplinary action, are also outlined.

The consultation, Complaints and Disciplinary Processes, follows the publication last July of a strategic review by complaints commissioner Rob Behrens, of the Bar’s complaints and disciplinary processes, in which he said the current system was in need of significant improvement and made 52 recommendations for change.

Ruth Evans, BSB chairman, says: “The proposals are designed to ensure that the complaints and disciplinary system is fair and effective.

The changes should improve the speed and efficiency of the system and, also, increase the confidence and satisfaction of consumers and barristers in the system.” The consultation paper can be downloaded at www.barstandardsboard.org.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlotte Coleman & Qaisar Sheikh

Two promoted to partner in property litigation and education teams

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Dorsey & Whitney LLP—Peter Knust

Cross-border finance and restructuring specialist joins as of counsel in London

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

Powell Gilbert—Callum Beamish-Lacey

IP firm promotes litigator to partnership

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll