header-logo header-logo

Bar Conference 2024 will ask ‘What next for justice?’

19 April 2024
Issue: 8068 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

The date for Bar Conference 2024 has been announced and, in a likely general election year, the headline speakers will be considering ‘What next for justice in England and Wales?’

This year’s headline speakers will be the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr, the Lord Chancellor Rt Hon Alex Chalk KC MP and Shadow Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood MP. The event will be held in London on Saturday, 8 June.

The three headliners will debate the big issues facing the justice sector, as court backlogs continue to grow and public spending looks more challenging than ever. Each will also take part in Q&A discussions.

Other panel debates include the effectiveness of international courts, AI’s place in the justice sector, and reform in the wake of the Post Office scandal.

The programme contains practical sessions on earnings and work allocation, futureproofing practice through ADR, navigating ethical dilemmas at the Bar, and intergenerational differences between baby boomers, generation X, millennials and gen Z.

The Bar Council will also be hosting the Lifetime Achievement in Pro Bono, the Sydney Elland Goldsmith Award, to be presented by the Lord Chancellor.

Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC said: ‘Bar Conference offers something for everyone. It’s a chance for the whole Bar to come together to grapple with the biggest challenges the justice sector.

‘Bar Conference took a break last year to give us the opportunity to rethink and refresh the format to give the profession an annual event to be proud of. We’ve listened to members and put together an excellent programme that tackles the important issues, offers practical sessions for career diversification and development, and includes useful professional networking.

‘I’m very much looking forward to seeing members from across the whole Bar coming together.’

Amrit Kaur Dhanoa, chair of the Young Barristers’ Committee, said: ‘Bar Conference brings the profession together, which can be hugely rewarding for those starting out in their careers at the Bar. It’s an invaluable opportunity to meet new people, exchange ideas, and engage in discussions over a new policy or practice area.’

The full programme and tickets are available through the Bar Council website.

Issue: 8068 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll