header-logo header-logo

Bar council warn against plans to hike court fees for debt recovery

22 January 2015
Issue: 7637 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Government plans to hike court fees for debt recovery actions by 420% will hit small businesses, the Bar Council has warned.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) announced plans in a written statement last week to introduce a fee of 5% of the value of the claim on claims for more than £10,000, with a cap of £10,000. The MoJ predicts this would raise £120m.

However, the Bar Council says this would mean small businesses, who already suffer from late payments, often from large customers such as supermarkets, will either not be able to pursue a claim or will face a hefty court fee.

Last April, the MoJ raised the maximum fee payable from £1,670 to £1,920. The proposed maximum fee is therefore an increase of 420%.

The deadline for responses to the consultation, Proposals for further reform to court fees, is 27 February.

Issue: 7637 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll