header-logo header-logo

20 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Bar exam delays ‘unacceptable’

More than 200 Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) students have signed a letter criticising the regulator for its handling of delays to barrister exams in response to COVID-19

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) announced this week it will delay the three Central Examination Board assessments in civil litigation, criminal litigation and profession ethics until August but would keep this ‘under review as the situation develops’.

However, the students say sitting the exam in August may be impossible for some international students, due to continued lockdown in their home countries. Those due to begin pupillage in the autumn will have to sit the exams during pupillage, and will have no opportunity to resit. Moreover, it will be unsafe, even in August, for some students with underlying health conditions to sit exams.

The letter, to BSB director general Mark Neale, the Director General of the Bar Standards Board (BSB), describes the current proposal as ‘inadequate’. It acknowledges the terrible impact Covid-19 is having on people’s lives and emphasises that the students don’t want to prioritise their concerns over those of others but to urge the BSB ‘to make reasonable adjustments to mitigate them’ where it can.

However, the students argue: ‘it is clear that it is the format of the exams, not their timing, which must be changed… there are other solutions which could be adopted.’ They suggest options such as using software to ensure exam entrants adhere to time limits, making the exams ‘open book’ and asking applicants to sign a declaration.

The letter, which sets out the reasons why the current arrangement is problematic, can be viewed here.

A BSB spokesperson said: ‘We are very conscious that this is an uncertain and worrying time for students but, at the current time, we have nothing further to add to the statement which we published earlier in the week.’

 

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll