header-logo header-logo

28 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory , Diversity , Equality , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Bar Handbook U-turn on diversity duty

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has abandoned its proposal to introduce a duty ‘to act in a way that advances equality, diversity and inclusion’ (EDI)

The BSB mooted the amendment to core duty 8 in the Bar Handbook last September, in its consultation on the proposed amendments to the equality rules. However, the Bar Council opposed the change.

Dropping the proposal this week, the BSB said it now intends to work with the profession and will ‘set clear expectations for the progress that we want to see over the next five years’.

Barbara Mills KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘We had significant concerns that a positive duty, as proposed by the BSB, would have taken us backwards.

‘We explained that a change to core duty 8 would lack the clarity needed for barristers to be able to comply. The proposals were not only impractical to implement, but they would also have been open to costly legal challenge that would hinder progress on EDI initiatives.

'We therefore welcome the BSB’s reflection on our concerns and the decision not to change but to maintain the current core duty—a clear and definitive duty not to discriminate.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll