header-logo header-logo

03 July 2019
Issue: 7847 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Bar protests suspended

Criminal barristers have voted 61:39 in favour of postponing protest action pending the outcome of an offer of higher fees.

Both defence and prosecution practitioners had been due to protest by staging a 1 July ‘walkout’ and refusing returns, but were offered ‘an accelerated package of measures’ by the Crown Prosecution Service, Ministry of Justice and Attorney-General. The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) then balloted its members on whether to provisionally accept or reject the deal.

Some 2,607 barristers voted, with 1,583 (61%) in favour of suspending action.

In their ‘Monday Message’, CBA chair Chris Henley QC and vice-chair Caroline Goodwin QC said: ‘This offer is not a solution―but provides an interim position.

‘We have made it clear that unless the CPS offer is implemented and meaningful solutions for AGFS (Advocates’ Graduated Fees Scheme) are proposed in November, then all bets will be off. The mandate stands and your anger will not be contained indefinitely.’

Last year, the CBA negotiated fee increases of £23m for defence work after protests by criminal barristers.

Issue: 7847 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll