header-logo header-logo

03 July 2019
Issue: 7847 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Bar protests suspended

Criminal barristers have voted 61:39 in favour of postponing protest action pending the outcome of an offer of higher fees.

Both defence and prosecution practitioners had been due to protest by staging a 1 July ‘walkout’ and refusing returns, but were offered ‘an accelerated package of measures’ by the Crown Prosecution Service, Ministry of Justice and Attorney-General. The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) then balloted its members on whether to provisionally accept or reject the deal.

Some 2,607 barristers voted, with 1,583 (61%) in favour of suspending action.

In their ‘Monday Message’, CBA chair Chris Henley QC and vice-chair Caroline Goodwin QC said: ‘This offer is not a solution―but provides an interim position.

‘We have made it clear that unless the CPS offer is implemented and meaningful solutions for AGFS (Advocates’ Graduated Fees Scheme) are proposed in November, then all bets will be off. The mandate stands and your anger will not be contained indefinitely.’

Last year, the CBA negotiated fee increases of £23m for defence work after protests by criminal barristers.

Issue: 7847 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll