header-logo header-logo

Bar regulator lays down its terms

26 March 2015
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Minimum £500,000 terms to apply to all BSB-regulated entities

Barrister-owned entities will need to have at least £500,000 indemnity cover per claim, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has confirmed.

The minimum terms apply to all BSB-regulated entities. Entities are businesses owned and managed by lawyers, which concentrate on activities such as advocacy, client representation in court and giving specialist advice. The BSB, which is due to start regulating entities next month, has received more than 75 expressions of interest and 16 completed applications so far. Providing confirmation about the necessary insurance arrangements is expected to encourage further interest.

The BSB has emphasised that barristers who have professional indemnity insurance in place, covering their practice as a self-employed barrister, can continue to practise in this capacity while they are waiting for entity insurance cover.

Frank Maher, partner, Legal Risk, says the terms are broadly similar to those applying to solicitors. “The cover is only £500,000 as against solicitors’ £2m (sole practitioners and partnerships)/£3m (incorporated practices). That is in line with the Bar Mutual cover which applies to barristers at present.

“This was the figure proposed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) which the Legal Services Board rejected last year—not enough in my view, because it includes claimants’ costs, so if a case goes to trial it leaves only half that or less for the claimant.

“There are a few other quirks which are potentially detrimental to consumers and not in the SRA Minimum Terms and Conditions, though they are already in the current Bar Mutual terms.”

These include (at 6.7) that if the insured refuses to settle against the insurer’s recommendation then the insurer’s liability is capped at that amount, and (at 6.8) there may be no cover if the insured offers to settle without the insurer’s authority.”

Maher says the terms contained successor practice provisions “broadly similar” to those for solicitors, which could “cause problems”.

All prospective BSB-regulated entities are urged to contact their insurer as soon as possible so as to start the process of obtaining the appropriate cover.

Issue: 7646 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll