header-logo header-logo

Bar regulator lays down its terms

26 March 2015
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Minimum £500,000 terms to apply to all BSB-regulated entities

Barrister-owned entities will need to have at least £500,000 indemnity cover per claim, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) has confirmed.

The minimum terms apply to all BSB-regulated entities. Entities are businesses owned and managed by lawyers, which concentrate on activities such as advocacy, client representation in court and giving specialist advice. The BSB, which is due to start regulating entities next month, has received more than 75 expressions of interest and 16 completed applications so far. Providing confirmation about the necessary insurance arrangements is expected to encourage further interest.

The BSB has emphasised that barristers who have professional indemnity insurance in place, covering their practice as a self-employed barrister, can continue to practise in this capacity while they are waiting for entity insurance cover.

Frank Maher, partner, Legal Risk, says the terms are broadly similar to those applying to solicitors. “The cover is only £500,000 as against solicitors’ £2m (sole practitioners and partnerships)/£3m (incorporated practices). That is in line with the Bar Mutual cover which applies to barristers at present.

“This was the figure proposed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) which the Legal Services Board rejected last year—not enough in my view, because it includes claimants’ costs, so if a case goes to trial it leaves only half that or less for the claimant.

“There are a few other quirks which are potentially detrimental to consumers and not in the SRA Minimum Terms and Conditions, though they are already in the current Bar Mutual terms.”

These include (at 6.7) that if the insured refuses to settle against the insurer’s recommendation then the insurer’s liability is capped at that amount, and (at 6.8) there may be no cover if the insured offers to settle without the insurer’s authority.”

Maher says the terms contained successor practice provisions “broadly similar” to those for solicitors, which could “cause problems”.

All prospective BSB-regulated entities are urged to contact their insurer as soon as possible so as to start the process of obtaining the appropriate cover.

Issue: 7646 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll