header-logo header-logo

Vision for post-election justice

12 June 2024
Issue: 8075 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail

The Bar Council and Law Society have published their pre-election wishlists for the next government, ahead of next month’s general election

The Bar has called for a £2.5bn investment in justice, coupled with a ‘wholly new approach’ to justice policy. According to Bar Council calculations, spending on justice in real terms per person has fallen by 22% since 2009/10.

Its ‘Manifesto for justice’, published last week, urges whoever forms the next government to: establish a Royal Commission on the criminal justice system; ensure Crown Court trials have a start date within six months of the first hearing; invest to secure a ‘sustainable and resilient justice system that commands public trust and confidence’; and recognise the courts as a vital public service like schools and hospitals.

Bar chair Sam Townend KC said: ‘It is time for a total rethink and our manifesto sets out what we think should be the key priorities. Proper investment would, in fact, save costs across public services.’

Law Society president Nick Emmerson urged the next government to ‘place legal services at the heart of plans for economic growth, renew our commitment to the rule of law and work proactively to protect and secure access to justice’.

He pointed out the legal sector adds £60bn to the UK economy each year and employs more than one per cent of the total UK workforce.

Moreover, legal services are one of the UK’s ‘most valuable exports’, he said, with England and Wales the second-largest legal market in the world and the ‘global jurisdiction of choice for international business deals’.

He urged the next government to place legal services ‘at the heart of trade agreements’ and secure ‘greater market access and practising rights for our lawyers. It should also support domestic law firms to invest, upskill and adopt new technology.’

Emmerson also called on the post-election government to uphold the rule of law, adhere to its international commitments and invest in access to justice. He said: ‘Immediate steps it can take include increasing criminal legal aid rates in real terms by 15% and injecting £11.3m into civil legal aid for early advice to safeguard the system.’

Issue: 8075 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll