header-logo header-logo

The bare bones

04 June 2013 / Janna Purdie
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Janna Purdie emphasises the increasing importance of keeping skeleton arguments in check

The clue is in the name. A skeleton argument is a written document provided to the court in advance of the hearing which summarises the issues to be addressed and the authorities to be relied upon. The purpose is to provide a platform for the advocate to make the party's case during oral submissions, ie the bare bones of the case to which the advocate will add flesh during submissions. The CPR clearly sets out what is required for the purposes of a skeleton argument and many practitioners comply with those provisions. However, some simply chose to ignore them and produce lengthy skeletons which fail to focus on the issues the court is required to determine.

The Court of Appeal has focused on the length of skeleton arguments in the past. Examples can be seen in Tombstone v Raja [2008] EWCA Civ 1444, where the skeleton argument for one party ran to 110 pages, in Midgulf v Groupe Chimique Tunisien [2010] EWCA Civ

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll