header-logo header-logo

Barriers to AI in commercial property

17 November 2021
Issue: 7957 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Technology
printer mail-detail
Commercial property lawyers are keen to adopt AI (artificial intelligence) or automation software but have encountered a series of obstacles, research has found

A study by due diligence software provider SearchFlow found 95% of law firms said the pandemic has accelerated their digitisation strategies, and 71% of senior real estate lawyers agreed digitising aspects of the legal process would give their firms a competitive advantage or market differentiation. The report, Commercial real estate lawyers of the future, published last week, also found 64% of firms have a digitisation roadmap already in place or in progress.  

However, some lawyers said they are struggling when it comes to integrating AI or automation. More than half the lawyers complained the fast-moving pace of technology made it difficult to scope what was required, while 43% found the technology too expensive and were having difficulty aligning budgets, and 40% of the lawyers cited change management as a potential obstacle, suggesting training, changing mindsets and incorporating change in day-to-day processes are hurdles that need to be overcome.

Others expressed concern about risk management―nearly half the lawyers believed increased use of automation in due diligence processes would increase their firm’s exposure to risk.

Dr Thomas Quirke, managing director of SearchFlow, said: ‘Looking into the future, while various barriers to AI adoption have been cited and represent the clear market challenge, there is a consensus that the use of more data driven processes and automation will play their part in enhancing the real estate transaction process.

‘Some 60% agreed that greater digitisation will enable lawyers to evolve their roles or upskill, as fewer manual interventions will be required. By 2025, a majority agree that technology adoption will lead to faster completions, overall better decision-making and a reduction in administrative steps, meaning practitioners can focus on progressing deals, removing human error and managing risk.’

Issue: 7957 / Categories: Legal News , Property , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll