header-logo header-logo

26 November 2009
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Barristers approved to form LDPs

Solicitors & barristers allowed to form businesses, after extensive consulation

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has given its approval for barristers to supply legal services through legal disciplinary practices (LDPs).

The decision which paves the way for barristers to set up in business with solicitors, and follows extensive work by a BSB working group, including three consultations on the possible impact of the Legal Services Act 2007.

Nicholas Green QC, the chairman-elect of the Bar Council, says: “The BSB’s decision represent an historic moment for the Bar.”

The BSB emphasised, in a statement released last week, that it did not want to lose the “unique attributes” of the Bar, including the cab-rank rule, independence of thought and collegiality through membership of the profession and the Inns of Court.

The board adopted a number of recommendations regarding LDPs:
l barristers should be permitted to become managers of LDPs which include up to 25% non-lawyer managers;
l barristers should be permitted to practise as both managers and as independent practitioners, and detailed guidance will be developed relating to this;
l barristers should be discouraged from becoming shareholders in LDPs due to possible conflict of interest issues, until further guidance is issued;
l barristers should be permitted to form barrister-only partnerships (BoPs) pending the creation of an appropriate regulator for such entities;
l barristers should be permitted in principle to practise through other barrister-only companies and limited liability partnerships; and
l the cab-rank rule will apply to barrister-only partnerships, and the BSB considers that all advocates should be subject to the cab-rank rule and will be raising this with other regulators.

The recommendations will take effect once they have been approved by the Ministry of Justice and the Legal Services Board.

Baroness Deech, chairman of the BSB, says: “[This] will send a shot of adrenaline through the profession.

“Our decisions on LDPs reflect the need to develop and enhance the supply of legal services so as to best serve clients of the Bar and guarantee access to justice.

"In relation to shareholding in LDPs, we discourage this until we are confident that proper clarification and guidance is in place about conflicts. In relation to dual practice, we hope to provide flexibility in the provision of barristers’ services to the benefit of both practitioners  and consumers."
 

Issue: 7395 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll