header-logo header-logo

Barristers relax rules

26 July 2013
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Profession receives modernisation makeover

Self-employed barristers will be able to conduct litigation and form associations with non-barristers next year.

The Legal Services Board has approved the lifting of certain practising restrictions from the Bar Standards Board (BSB) new code of conduct. The revised code will form part II of the new BSB Handbook.

From January 2014, barristers will be able to apply for an extension to their practicing certificate to conduct litigation. This means clients of public access barristers will no longer have to act as self-represented litigants and conduct the administrative tasks themselves.

They will be able to share premises and form associations with non-barristers – both of which are banned under the current code of conduct. Barristers will also be required to self-report and report others for “serious misconduct”.

The BSB is adopting a new strategy to supervision, under which disciplinary action will only be taken for the more serious breaches of conduct.

Baroness Deech, chair of the BSB, said: “Superfluous rules have been stripped away and others modernised.

“Through developing a risk-based approach to supervision we will be better placed to work with the profession to prevent non-compliance from materialising in the first place or to avoid a recurrence of less serious non-compliance.”

Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll