header-logo header-logo

16 September 2022
Issue: 7994 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Barristers suspend demonstration but continue action

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) cancelled scheduled demonstrations, public gatherings and attendance at central lobby in Parliament this week, out of respect for HM The Queen

However, the action continues, with criminal law barristers declining to attend court and refusing to accept new instructions or returns.

CBA chair, Kirsty Brimelow KC said: ‘The action is having substantial impact and resolution is a logical government step.

‘The crisis is not caused by barristers. On an economic level alone, the ongoing cost to the criminal justice system of additional hearings and adjournment of trials and empty courtrooms is likely to outstrip the amount required to resolve this action.’

A number of senior judges, including in Bristol, Isleworth, Bolton, Leicester, Lincoln, Woolwich and Manchester (Minshull Street) have refused to extend custody time limits in cases where there is no defence barrister due to the ongoing action. Brimelow said: ‘Their judgments are clear that the CBA action increased gradually, giving government plenty of space and time to resolve it.

‘The judgments spell out that the government has had ample time to resolve the legal aid dispute and ongoing crisis in the criminal justice system.’

Brimelow and other representatives from the Bar are due to meet with the Lord Chancellor, Brandon Lewis next week to discuss the dispute.

Criminal barristers had escalated their protests to indefinite action, on 5 September, having begun by refusing returns in April, and moving to incrementally increasing strike action in June.

They are calling for a 25% increase in legal aid fees for defence work, and demand the government ‘at least’ implement with immediate effect the minimum 15% increase recommended by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s criminal legal aid review (CLAR).

However, the Ministry of Justice has so far promised only a 15% increase in October, which the CBA says would not reach barristers’ pockets until late 2023.

Issue: 7994 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll