header-logo header-logo

26 May 2020
Issue: 7888 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

Barristers want safety in court

COVID-19 cleanliness concerns
Nearly 85% of criminal barristers are concerned about the health risks to them or their households of returning to court under current circumstances, a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) survey, has found (see ‘The Impact of COVID-19’ (https://bit.ly/2yyPuLo).

However, 80% agreed the risk to them and their family could be reduced to an acceptable level if all the safety measures mentioned in the survey were implemented.

These measures, which were all supported by the vast majority of respondents, included deep cleaning of courts between trials, as well as the supply of disinfectant, hand sanitiser, paper towels and adequate washing facilities, and the supply of plastic or glass screens so they could safely confer with defendants and witnesses. More than 90% thought it either essential or desirable that HM Courts and Tribunals supply PPE (personal protective equipment) in line with any government guidance to counsel, defendants, witnesses and court staff.

The results of the survey, completed by 1,878 barristers, were published last week.

CBA chair Caroline Goodwin QC said: ‘My recollection of the court estate was of dirty courts, broken seats, waste bins left overflowing, unkempt poorly cleaned and frankly unloved neglected buildings.’ However, a clean-up operation has taken place. Goodwin said she has visited courts including Newcastle, Leeds, Old Bailey, Cardiff, Bristol, Warwick and Minshull street, and ‘from the custody suite arrangements for conference, to the marking out with gaffer tape, the buildings look and feel very different’.

Meanwhile, jury trials were listed to start in Reading, Warwick and Winchester Crown Courts this week. Jury trials have also been taking place at Manchester Minshull Street, Bristol, Cardiff and The Old Bailey.

Mr Justice Edis, chair of the Jury Trials Working Group, which is looking for safe ways for jury trials to proceed, said: ‘The feedback received from participants, including court staff, jurors, witnesses and legal professionals, has been positive.’

Issue: 7888 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll