header-logo header-logo

Bars & the ballot box

17 June 2011 / Craig Barlow , Jason Hadden
Issue: 7470 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Craig Barlow & Jason Hadden question the government’s blanket ban on prisoner voting

It is a delicious irony that those most affected by the criminal laws of the UK are effectively refused the opportunity through the ballot box to change those laws. That, of course, was Emily Pankhurst’s problem.

Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 provides that: “A convicted person during the time that he is detained in a penal institution in pursuance of his sentence…is legally incapable of voting at any parliamentary or local government election.”

In relation to elections to the European Parliament, s 8 of the European Parliamentary Elections Act 2002 adopts the same stance. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has consistently held since 2004 that this statutory blanket ban thereby created is unlawful.

In Greens and MT v UK the ECtHR recently repeated its position. On 10 February 2011 the House of Commons picked a fight with the ECtHR.

MPs voted by 234 to 22 to defy the EHtCR decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll