header-logo header-logo

Bars & the ballot box

17 June 2011 / Craig Barlow , Jason Hadden
Issue: 7470 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Craig Barlow & Jason Hadden question the government’s blanket ban on prisoner voting

It is a delicious irony that those most affected by the criminal laws of the UK are effectively refused the opportunity through the ballot box to change those laws. That, of course, was Emily Pankhurst’s problem.

Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 provides that: “A convicted person during the time that he is detained in a penal institution in pursuance of his sentence…is legally incapable of voting at any parliamentary or local government election.”

In relation to elections to the European Parliament, s 8 of the European Parliamentary Elections Act 2002 adopts the same stance. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has consistently held since 2004 that this statutory blanket ban thereby created is unlawful.

In Greens and MT v UK the ECtHR recently repeated its position. On 10 February 2011 the House of Commons picked a fight with the ECtHR.

MPs voted by 234 to 22 to defy the EHtCR decision

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll