header-logo header-logo

Bats at risk from HS2

28 April 2021
Issue: 7930 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Animal welfare , Public
printer mail-detail
Environmental protesters have lost their legal case to protect rare barbastelle bats roosting in the path of the High Speed Two (HS2) rail link.

The High Court this week overturned an injunction against tree-felling in Jones Hill Wood, Buckinghamshire, in R (on the application of Keir) v Natural England [2021] EWHC 1059 (Admin).

The proposed construction work required 19 trees to be felled. The bats are ‘European protected species’ under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017.

Ecologist Mark Keir challenged Natural England’s decision to grant a licence, arguing Natural England had erred in law and that the proposed alternatives of bat boxes while allowing the HS2 line to run through the woods left the bats at risk.

Natural England countered that it believed the bat breeding site would be safe and pointed out that barbastelles may use several maternity roosts for their pups, each for a few days at a time.

Mr Justice Holgate noted that barbastelles are extremely rare―the population is estimated to be as low as 5,000.

In his judgment, he considered how the decision-maker must weigh up risk, stating ‘levels of confidence, or likelihood, or risk, may be judged to be acceptable if the decision-maker does not consider that there is a reasonable scientific doubt about whether an action authorised by a licence would be detrimental to the maintenance of the population of a species at a "favourable conservation status in their natural range".

‘On the other hand… an expression of likelihood, such as the balance of probabilities, should not be substituted as a decision-making test for the "absence of reasonable scientific doubt" required by the precautionary principle’.

He said he attached ‘considerable weight’ to the public interest of continuing the HS2 project.

Discharging the injunction, Holgate J said: ‘Even if it were to be arguable that Natural England has made an error of law in one or more of the respects alleged, I am not persuaded that the injunction is necessary to avoid that risk’.
Issue: 7930 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Animal welfare , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors examine recent international relocation cases where allegations of domestic abuse shaped outcomes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
back-to-top-scroll