header-logo header-logo

Bats at risk from HS2

28 April 2021
Issue: 7930 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Animal welfare , Public
printer mail-detail
Environmental protesters have lost their legal case to protect rare barbastelle bats roosting in the path of the High Speed Two (HS2) rail link.

The High Court this week overturned an injunction against tree-felling in Jones Hill Wood, Buckinghamshire, in R (on the application of Keir) v Natural England [2021] EWHC 1059 (Admin).

The proposed construction work required 19 trees to be felled. The bats are ‘European protected species’ under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017.

Ecologist Mark Keir challenged Natural England’s decision to grant a licence, arguing Natural England had erred in law and that the proposed alternatives of bat boxes while allowing the HS2 line to run through the woods left the bats at risk.

Natural England countered that it believed the bat breeding site would be safe and pointed out that barbastelles may use several maternity roosts for their pups, each for a few days at a time.

Mr Justice Holgate noted that barbastelles are extremely rare―the population is estimated to be as low as 5,000.

In his judgment, he considered how the decision-maker must weigh up risk, stating ‘levels of confidence, or likelihood, or risk, may be judged to be acceptable if the decision-maker does not consider that there is a reasonable scientific doubt about whether an action authorised by a licence would be detrimental to the maintenance of the population of a species at a "favourable conservation status in their natural range".

‘On the other hand… an expression of likelihood, such as the balance of probabilities, should not be substituted as a decision-making test for the "absence of reasonable scientific doubt" required by the precautionary principle’.

He said he attached ‘considerable weight’ to the public interest of continuing the HS2 project.

Discharging the injunction, Holgate J said: ‘Even if it were to be arguable that Natural England has made an error of law in one or more of the respects alleged, I am not persuaded that the injunction is necessary to avoid that risk’.
Issue: 7930 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Animal welfare , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll