header-logo header-logo

27 January 2011
Issue: 7450 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Battle of the Chattels

An ancillary relief consent order provides for equal division by agreement of the parties’ chattels...

An ancillary relief consent order provides for equal division by agreement of the parties’ chattels and determination by the court in default of agreement. The parties cannot agree. On determination, will s 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 factors be engaged or are they displaced by the agreement for equality?

The section 25 factors will be engaged and that is why such an order is so unsatisfactory as it purports to hive off one element of the application whereas the court’s duty relates to the parties’ affairs generally. Therefore, it is not inconceivable that the district judge will refuse to approve such an order which leaves chattel sharing unresolved. An arguably ingenious practice adopted by one court was to direct a Scott Schedule requiring each item to be listed with the parties inserting the monetary value for it for which they contended on the basis that the item went to the party giving the higher figure but that party

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll