header-logo header-logo

24 May 2012 / Lucy Chakaodza
Issue: 7515 / Categories: Features , Profession , Mediation
printer mail-detail

Battle of the sexes

Do women make better mediators? Lucy Chakaodza reports

What makes a good mediator—personality, age, a background in the legal sector or a person’s gender? Can gender affect mediation - do innate characteristics provide an advantage for a female mediator?

The increased need for more

diversity in the workplace, professional bodies and in institutions, means that women still face certain hurdles and disadvantages in getting to the top of their chosen career. Is there any evidence to suggest that like within other areas of industry which is largely male dominated, there is an unfair bias in how people perceive female and male mediators?

Existing studies such as “Men and women as mediators: disputant perceptions” (2008) by Alice F Stuhlmacher and Melissa G Morrissett, have shown that male mediators
are perceived more favourably than their female counterparts and that there is an unconscious bias in people’s minds in how females are viewed. Although this may be true in some cases there is no definitive research to validate this claim.

In Kathy Perkins’s LLC,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll