header-logo header-logo

A battle of wills

26 November 2009 / Paola Fudakowska , Adam Cloherty , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty examine rectification & statutory wills

In Parkinson v Fawdon [2009] EWHC 1953 (Ch) the deceased (D) and H owned a farm jointly. They made mirror wills, under which each left his estate to the other, appointing him as sole executor. In the event that the other did not survive the testator, an alternative executor was named with substitute provisions in respect of residue.

D died two weeks after H and the alternative provisions of D’s will took effect in relation to both estates. D’s will appointed the defendant (F) and “Mark Parkinson of 215 Ditching Road Brighton in the County of Sussex” as his executors. The residuary estate was to be divided between Mark Parkinson, F and her sisters.

P brought an application for rectification of the will under Administration of Justice Act 1982, s 20 on the basis that there was no one who matched the description of “Mark Parkinson of 215 Ditching Road Brighton in the County of Sussex” and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll