header-logo header-logo

26 November 2009 / Paola Fudakowska , Adam Cloherty , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

A battle of wills

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty examine rectification & statutory wills

In Parkinson v Fawdon [2009] EWHC 1953 (Ch) the deceased (D) and H owned a farm jointly. They made mirror wills, under which each left his estate to the other, appointing him as sole executor. In the event that the other did not survive the testator, an alternative executor was named with substitute provisions in respect of residue.

D died two weeks after H and the alternative provisions of D’s will took effect in relation to both estates. D’s will appointed the defendant (F) and “Mark Parkinson of 215 Ditching Road Brighton in the County of Sussex” as his executors. The residuary estate was to be divided between Mark Parkinson, F and her sisters.

P brought an application for rectification of the will under Administration of Justice Act 1982, s 20 on the basis that there was no one who matched the description of “Mark Parkinson of 215 Ditching Road Brighton in the County of Sussex” and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll