header-logo header-logo

02 December 2010
Issue: 7444 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A battle of wills

Relatives fight over wills as value of estates dwindle

Legal disputes over wills have multiplied tenfold in the last three years, as beneficiaries inherit less than expected due to the recession.
In the past year, the number of bereaved relatives launching High Court legal challenges jumped by 38%, according to statistics obtained by City law firm, Wedlake Bell.

The Chancery Division, London heard 110 cases involving contested wills or intestacy in 2009, compared with 80 in 2008. Wedlake Bell reports a tenfold increase in the past three years, from just ten such cases in 2006. The firm says the pattern is likely to be repeated across the country and that, as many claims are settled out of court, these figures reflect only a fraction of the total number of disputes.

Fay Copeland, partner at Wedlake Bell, says: “The recession has had a hugely detrimental impact on the size of estates with the value of family homes, shares and other assets having all dwindled.
“As the pie gets smaller, the temptation for beneficiaries to fight for a bigger slice increases.

“The scope for inheritance disputes increases dramatically with the number of marriages, divorces and children that are involved. Anyone who was in some way financially dependent on the deceased at the time of death may be able to make a valid claim, so that also applies to children outside marriages, cohabitees and even mistresses.”

Copeland says using unregulated will writing services created further risks, because “a small mistake can actually lead to a big problem further down the line”. She advised that an accompanying letter explaining the testator’s wishes might make the will harder to challenge.

The law on intestacy is currently being reviewed by the Law Commission, which produced a consultation paper last year. A report and draft Bill are due to be published in 2011.

 

Issue: 7444 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll