header-logo header-logo

02 December 2010
Issue: 7444 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A battle of wills

Relatives fight over wills as value of estates dwindle

Legal disputes over wills have multiplied tenfold in the last three years, as beneficiaries inherit less than expected due to the recession.
In the past year, the number of bereaved relatives launching High Court legal challenges jumped by 38%, according to statistics obtained by City law firm, Wedlake Bell.

The Chancery Division, London heard 110 cases involving contested wills or intestacy in 2009, compared with 80 in 2008. Wedlake Bell reports a tenfold increase in the past three years, from just ten such cases in 2006. The firm says the pattern is likely to be repeated across the country and that, as many claims are settled out of court, these figures reflect only a fraction of the total number of disputes.

Fay Copeland, partner at Wedlake Bell, says: “The recession has had a hugely detrimental impact on the size of estates with the value of family homes, shares and other assets having all dwindled.
“As the pie gets smaller, the temptation for beneficiaries to fight for a bigger slice increases.

“The scope for inheritance disputes increases dramatically with the number of marriages, divorces and children that are involved. Anyone who was in some way financially dependent on the deceased at the time of death may be able to make a valid claim, so that also applies to children outside marriages, cohabitees and even mistresses.”

Copeland says using unregulated will writing services created further risks, because “a small mistake can actually lead to a big problem further down the line”. She advised that an accompanying letter explaining the testator’s wishes might make the will harder to challenge.

The law on intestacy is currently being reviewed by the Law Commission, which produced a consultation paper last year. A report and draft Bill are due to be published in 2011.

 

Issue: 7444 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll