header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 160, Issue 7444

02 December 2010
IN THIS ISSUE
Bribery Act Special Premium Content

Time to take note...

03 December 2010
An unfair divide? Premium Content

Here’s a disquieting thought as we approach the brave new liberalised legal services world...

02 December 2010 / Dr Jon Robins
Trouble at mill Premium Content

Jon Holbrook questions mandatory rights to possession that are not mandatory

02 December 2010 / Jon Holbrook
Out on your own? Premium Content

John McMullen reports on recent TUPE developments in the individual sphere

02 December 2010 / John McMullen
Set aside Premium Content

David Burrows examines the lessons set by Kingdon

02 December 2010 / David Burrows
Odgen’s end? Premium Content

Ogden 6: are the tables in tatters? Brent McDonald reports

02 December 2010 / Brent Mcdonald
Interpreting inconsistencies Premium Content

Conflicting jurisdiction clauses assessed by Roger Enock & Ian Redfearn

02 December 2010 / Ian Redfearn / Roger Enock
Shipping—Charterparties—BPVOY 4 form Premium Content

National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia v BP Oil Supply Company [2010] EWHC 3043 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 235 (Nov)

02 December 2010
Human rights—Prisoners—Right to vote Premium Content

Greens and another v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 60041/08, [2010] All ER (D) 280 (Nov) European Court of Human Rights

02 December 2010
Arbitration Premium Content

Stellar Shipping Co LLC v Hudson Shipping Lines [2010] EWHC 2985 (Comm), [2010] All ER (D) 236 (Nov)

02 December 2010
Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur under scrutiny
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
NLJ this week: Does dishonesty always mean strike-off?
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
NLJ this week: Potanin, prenups & privacy
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
NLJ this week: Malaysia’s arbitration overhaul
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
NLJ this week: Greed but no fraud in £1.4bn SKAT case
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll