header-logo header-logo

Human rights—Prisoners—Right to vote

02 December 2010
Issue: 7444 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Greens and another v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 60041/08, [2010] All ER (D) 280 (Nov) European Court of Human Rights

Judge Garlicki (President), Judges Bratza, Mijovic, Bjorgvinsson, Bianku, Poalelungi and De Gaetano, and L Early (Section Registrar), 23 Nov 2010

The United Kingdom must remove the blanket ban on prisoner voting in s 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 (RPA 1983) and s 8 of the European Parliamentary Elections Act 2002 (EPE 2002) within six months.
At the material times, the applicants were all serving prisoners. The Electoral Registration Officer refused their applications for registration to vote on the basis of their status as convicted persons detained in a penal institution.

Section 3 of RPA 1983 imposed a blanket restriction on all convicted prisoners in detention irrespective of the length of their sentence and irrespective of the nature or gravity of their offence and their individual circumstances. The blanket restriction introduced by s 3 of RPA 1983 was extended to elections to the European Parliament by s 8 of EPE 2002. The applicants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll