header-logo header-logo

02 December 2010 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7444 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

An unfair divide?

Here’s a disquieting thought as we approach the brave new liberalised legal services world...

Some 80% of the work undertaken by law firms falls within the category of “non-reserved” legal work...in other words, anyone (not just lawyers) can do it.

The figure was arrived at by Professor Stephen Mayson, the legal academic who came up with the memorable and equally alarming finding that as many as 3,000 law firms could go to the wall as a result of the reforms flowing from the Legal Services Act 2007.

More questions than answers?

Well, the following questions spring to mind: Despite all the fuss in the legal press, what’s the point in new market entrants becoming alternative business structures next October if most of their business doesn’t actually need to be regulated? What’s the point in employing lawyers to do the kind of work which non-lawyers can do and, frankly, what’s the point in becoming a lawyer at all?

This is the first in a series of three articles looking at the six reserved

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll