header-logo header-logo

Baxter: take three

19 May 2011 / Joseph Ollech
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Alteration v rectification. Joseph Ollech considers when a mistake really is a mistake

Common sense has prevailed once again in the case of Baxter v Mannion [2011] EWCA Civ 120, [2011] All ER (D) 235 (Feb). Mr Baxter has now lost three times in a row in his attempt to be registered as a freehold proprietor based on adverse possession—before the land adjudicator, the High Court, and on appeal to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal gave permission to appeal because it raised an important question of principle—an example of those rarer types of appeal which are heard not so much because there is a serious prospect of success but because there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard.

For those not already familiar with this case it was about freehold title to a field in Chatteris, Cambridgeshire. Baxter claimed that he had been in adverse possession of the field. If that was all there was to this case it would not be of any particular legal significance.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll