header-logo header-logo

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

02 October 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Commercial disputes team lead promoted to partner

BCL Solicitors LLP has announced the promotion of Robert Lawrie to partner, recognising his pivotal role in establishing and leading the firm’s commercial disputes team since 2023. Lawrie’s appointment reflects the firm’s expanding expertise in high-value litigation, fraud claims, arbitration, asset recovery and complex multi-jurisdictional disputes.

With more than two decades of experience, Lawrie is a highly regarded litigator recommended in leading legal directories. His practice spans commercial and civil litigation fraud claims, shareholder and trust disputes, injunctive relief, arbitration and cross-border asset recovery. His clients include corporates, high-net-worth individuals, directors and regulated entities. Recent instructions have included a $2bn fraud case, multi-jurisdictional shareholder fraud proceedings, and litigation linked to the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Before joining BCL, Lawrie practised as a barrister and held partnerships at leading City and Mayfair firms. Since his arrival, he has been instrumental in developing the commercial disputes team into a core part of the firm’s offering. ‘Rob’s depth of experience, strategic mind, and client-first approach make him a formidable litigator,’ said managing partner Richard Sallybanks. ‘His appointment as partner reflects both his personal contribution and the confidence placed in him by clients and colleagues.’

Lawrie’s promotion further underscores BCL’s commitment to providing clients with integrated advice across civil, criminal and regulatory issues. The firm’s disputes team now complements its market-leading practices in business crime, tax investigations, and serious and general crime, enabling it to offer clients comprehensive representation in complex, high-stakes matters.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
back-to-top-scroll