header-logo header-logo

16 February 2012 / Paul Grimwood
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Be prepared

Will-makers should put their affairs in order early, says Paul Grimwood

Last year’s television series Can’t take it with you, starring Sir Gerry Robinson, was compulsory viewing in my household. The premise of the series was that, if there was likely to be a dispute after someone’s death about the contents of their will then it was better to try to agree a “settlement”, usually involving the whole family, while the will-maker was still alive.

Of course, once the cameras had been packed up and the film makers had gone away, the will-maker was free to change their will, possibly making a new one in radically different terms. Alternatively, the good intentions of everyone concerned could have been thwarted by someone connected to the will-maker making an application under the Inheritance (Provision for Family & Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) after they have died.

Recognised applicants

The first hurdle for an applicant is to establish that they can bring themselves within one of the categories of “recognised applicants” under s 1 of I(PFD)A 1975

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harper James—Lottie Hugo

Harper James—Lottie Hugo

Commercial law firm announces appointment of corporate partner

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
back-to-top-scroll